House of Hackers

Monsy's Comments

Comment Wall (53 comments)

You need to be a member of House of Hackers to add comments!

Join this Ning Network

At 7:29am on March 30, 2009, eLKei said…
hello =]
At 9:14pm on March 20, 2009, X-M@gn@mite said…
hellooooo pretty monsy how you doing?
At 12:34am on February 9, 2009, Der Jäger said…
I think we can talk on higher levels of thought. Add me and we shall see, with what I perceive you seem to appear to be on a higher level of thought. Therefore perhaps we will speak soon should all the variables be in our favor.
At 12:28am on February 9, 2009, Der Jäger said…

Think of a guitar string that has been tuned by stretching the string under tension across the guitar. Depending on how the string is plucked and how much tension is in the string, different musical notes will be created by the string. These musical notes could be said to be excitation modes of that guitar string under tension.
In a similar manner, in string theory, the elementary particles we observe in particle accelerators could be thought of as the "musical notes" or excitation modes of elementary strings.
In string theory, as in guitar playing, the string must be stretched under tension in order to become excited. However, the strings in string theory are floating in spacetime, they aren't tied down to a guitar. Nonetheless, they have tension. The string tension in string theory is denoted by the quantity 1/(2 p a'), where a' is pronounced "alpha prime"and is equal to the square of the string length scale.
If string theory is to be a theory of quantum gravity, then the average size of a string should be somewhere near the length scale of quantum gravity, called the Planck length, which is about 10-33 centimeters, or about a millionth of a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a centimeter. Unfortunately, this means that strings are way too small to see by current or expected particle physics technology (or financing!!) and so string theorists must devise more clever methods to test the theory than just looking for little strings in particle experiments.
String theories are classified according to whether or not the strings are required to be closed loops, and whether or not the particle spectrum includes fermions. In order to include fermions in string theory, there must be a special kind of symmetry called supersymmetry, which means for every boson (particle that transmits a force) there is a corresponding fermion (particle that makes up matter). So supersymmetry relates the particles that transmit forces to the particles that make up matter.
Supersymmetric partners to to currently known particles have not been observed in particle experiments, but theorists believe this is because supersymmetric particles are too massive to be detected at current accelerators. Particle accelerators could be on the verge of finding evidence for high energy supersymmetry in the next decade. Evidence for supersymmetry at high energy would be compelling evidence that string theory was a good mathematical model for Nature at the smallest distance scales.
At 12:26am on February 9, 2009, Der Jäger said…
Quantum physics is about the characteristics of subatomic particles and it says that energie is not continuously, but in form of quanta (packages). Before I begin with quantum physics I advise the readers who does not know much about nuclear physics to read the homepage of nuclear physics, because otherwise quantum physics might be difficult to understand. But if you known the structure of an atom and particles then it is not nessecary to read the homepage of nuclear physics. Another thing is very important, during reading about quantum physics you must forget about all logical physical laws, because the laws in the subatomic world are inconceivably for us. After reading this website you might have different conception of the world.
At 12:24am on February 9, 2009, Der Jäger said…
Photobucket
At 10:19am on February 4, 2009, alex said…
hi...........
At 1:48am on February 3, 2009, DopeX said…
Hi there.damn,never saw so many good looking computer expert chicks ,nice :) This is pure heaven .
At 1:16am on December 4, 2008, Mariow said…
Hi! Where r u from ?
At 7:44am on December 1, 2008, nic said…
awesome.>!!
At 10:34pm on November 30, 2008, #HBT_Rodrigo Alves said…
have u used IRC?
At 8:08pm on November 29, 2008, Matrix said…
i prefer her eyes :x
At 12:47am on November 20, 2008, an76915 said…
Hello. Nice glasses, someday I'll have to use, and probably will choose them like yours.
At 11:14am on November 16, 2008, Canadian Spike said…
Monsy i am Canadian Spike the owner of http://www.dark-hack.net, there's an interesting deal 4 you, i sent you a friend request and i think you should register an account in Dark-Hack and send me a private message saying i am here and leave the rest on me ;)
At 3:31pm on September 28, 2008, snapcrackerz said…
ok...so since your pretty hot and you was offerd a T-Shirt lol kidding nice to meet you!
At 9:40am on August 26, 2008, sadboy said…
my friend~
At 1:04pm on August 25, 2008, The_NeTpSyChO said…
thx for add.
At 5:36pm on August 24, 2008, k3vin mitnick said…
At 6:49am on August 16, 2008, Wellington said…
hi
At 4:07am on August 7, 2008, 9u85u3d 4v3n839 said…
i wanted to go to defcon so bad this year!...sorry i just wanted to let someone know how disappointed i am for not being able to go this year lol

© 2009   Created by pdp on Ning.   Create a Ning Network!

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!