House of Hackers

What we think of security in the different Linux distributions?



Luminus

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

That's because you probably haven't read the yesterday's news here..

Reply to This

On Kubuntu this morning there was a nice upgrade package for OpenSSL to 0.9.8g-4ubuntu3. I think this upgrade solves the issue..

Reply to This

It does - if you don't have (possibly) compromised SSH keys lying around.. I did have several, and had to update them all - manually - and even cursed a bit..

Reply to This

you had to wait this morning upgrade: compromised RSA keys blacklist... Sorry to hear you got angry in the "cleansing" process ^_^ (really love jap emoticons)

Reply to This

I have a Debian based firewall; I choose Debian because I think it's one of the most secure distribution because of its updating policies and because it comes only with basic commands and tools, without useless stuffs that are no necessary on a server system.
So, the less services I have installed, the less vulnerabilities I get! :)

Reply to This

Less services does not necessarily mean more secure. It does possibly mean less risk though.

See the link below, case in point of distro maintainers thinking they can fix bugs in other projects and causing more issues, specifically debian and other distros based on it.

https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-security-announce/2008-May...

Reply to This

"I love gentoo"

say that man... we are waiting!

Reply to This

hahaha....

I LOVE LINUX

I prefer gentoo

nuff said

Reply to This

grsecurity.net. w00t.

(Brad keeps us safe)

:D

Reply to This

haha

Reply to This

I love it tooooo

but my flavor was debby...(debian)

Reply to This

You are right about Debian case on openssh, and for a certain kind of software maybe is preferable not to 'create' your own version, but to use the standard, worldwide-used, version.

Regarding services and vulnerabilities, if I have to improve security on a system, first of all I remove all unnecessary services that comes with it. Don't mind if they are secure or not, but if I don't need them I just remove them.
Supposing that necessary services are very well configured, the only risks I can get with them come from vulnerabilities.
I think about it in a statistical way: the more services I have installed, the more probability to have a vulnerability-related problem. (Then if you are really unlucky maybe the only one service you have installed could be vulnerable too :) )
Obviously in my opinion.... :)

Reply to This

RSS

About

pdp pdp created this Ning Network.

© 2009   Created by pdp on Ning.   Create a Ning Network!

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!